Neither is naïve. Welfare is not "betraying the cause." Rights is not "unrealistic." They are two different answers to two different questions.
: Proposes that animals have inherent moral worth and rights—similar to human rights—that protect them from exploitation. 0.5.6, 0.5.14 Advocates often argue that humans should not use animals for any personal gain, as it denies their dignity and basic right to liberty. 0.5.6, 0.5.16 Evolution of Welfare Science bestiality girl and dog animal sex bestialityavi top
Earlier that morning, Elara had visited Kael at the city’s largest rescue sanctuary. Kael had spent twenty years in the trenches of welfare, often working with the Animal Legal Defense Fund to enforce anti-cruelty laws. He showed her a group of beagles recently rescued from a testing facility. Neither is naïve
In 1965, the Brambell Committee established the Five Freedoms, which are widely accepted as the foundation for animal welfare: He showed her a group of beagles recently
You do not have to pick a side completely to act ethically. However, acknowledging the difference refines your moral compass.
: The United Nations Environment Assembly adopted a landmark resolution on the "animal welfare–environment–sustainable development nexus," marking the first time the UN formally recognized these links. 0.5.7